1628 (1943) (flag salute), are inapposite because they involve examples of symbolic expression, not verbal communication, and articulate guidelines for determining what symbolic acts may constitute expression. In the present case, because plaintiff's conduct in having the movie shown cannot be considered expressive or communicative, under the circumstances presented, the protection of the First Amendment is not implicated. 487, 78 L.Ed.2d 683 (1983). Boring v. Buncombe County Bd. (Education Code 60605.86- . They also found the movie objectionable because of its sexual content, vulgar language, and violence. She also said she would show an edited version of the movie again if she had the opportunity to explain it to the students. See, e.g., Martin v. Parrish, 805 F.2d 583 (5th Cir. denied, 409 U.S. 1042, 93 S.Ct. A federal judge ruled that the firing violated Ms. Fowlers First Amendment rights of free expression, and ordered her reinstated and paid $10,000 for emotional distress. 3273, 91 L.Ed.2d 563 (1986); Smith v. Price, 616 F.2d 1371, 1379 n. 10 (5th Cir. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied July 21, 1987. This segment of the film was shown in the morning session. Joint Appendix at 291. James W. Williams, III, Rankin, Baker and Williams, Stanford, Ky., Robert L. Chenoweth, Bryan, Fogle and Chenoweth, Mt. The students in Fowler's classes were in grades nine through eleven and were of the ages fourteen through seventeen. 161.790(1)(b) is not unconstitutionally vague. 1976) (insubordinate acts were clearly within scope of regulation governing "unofficerlike conduct"; regulation not vague as applied), cert. James W. Williams, III, Rankin, Baker and Williams, Stanford, Ky., Robert L. Chenoweth, Bryan, Fogle and Chenoweth, Mt. Lincoln County School Board Ms. Montoya's professional experience spans 25 plus years in non-profit management, government relations, and community and economic development. Boring v. Buncombe County Board of Education (136 E 3 d 364 [1998]), the Fourth Circuit Court, citing the 1988 decision Hazelwood v. Kulhmeir (484 U.S. 260), found The movie here seems to me to present a message similar to that expounded by Dr. Spock: abuse of sex and drugs as well as various forms of mental instability and anti-social conduct are associated with an overly authoritarian society. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research. at 736 (wearing black armband was conduct akin to pure speech); Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 141-42, 86 S.Ct. Another shows the protagonist cutting his chest with a razor. 2727, 2729-31, 41 L.Ed.2d 842 (1974) (per curiam) (display of flag with peace symbol attached was expressive conduct entitled to protection under First Amendment); Tinker, 393 U.S. at 505, 89 S.Ct. He did so by attempting to cover the 25"' screen with an 8 1/2"' by 11"' letter-sized file folder. Therefore, he said, her decision to permit the students to see the film is not a form of expression entitled to protection under the First Amendment., Judge John W. Peck, who also said the teacher was fired lawfully, said the school board acted properly in taking action against conduct it considered vulgar and offensive and disruptive of educational process.. 161.790(1), which proscribes conduct unbecoming a teacher, is unconstitutionally vague as applied to her conduct. District Court Opinion at 23. I believe a teacher should be similarly protected by the First Amendment whether she is participating in an instructional or non-instructional day. The case is Fowler vs. Lincoln County Board of Education, 87-657. v. Stachura, 477 U.S. 299, 304-05, 106 S.Ct. Sec. The justices, without comment, let stand a ruling that the teachers free- expression rights were not violated. The mere fact that at some point she may have developed an approval of the content of the movie is not, standing alone, a sufficient basis for the conclusion that her conduct in having the movie shown was a form of expression entitled to protection under the First Amendment. Subscribers can access the reported version of this case. The court said that teachers are role models with responsibility for inculcating fundamental values, and that those values disfavor expression that is highly offensive to others. Opinion of Judge Peck at p. 668. 777, 780-81, 96 L.Ed. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the judgment of the district court and dismiss plaintiff's action. Id., at 410, 94 S.Ct. As we have noted, the "R" rated movie was shown on a noninstructional day to students in Fowler's classes in grades nine through eleven who were of ages ranging from fourteen through seventeen. She testified that, despite the fact that she had never seen the movie before having it shown to her students, and despite the fact that she was posting grades on report cards and left the room several times while the movie was being shown, she believed it had significant value. 1979); Keefe v. Geanakos, 418 F.2d 359, 362 (1st Cir. 1953, 1957, 32 L.Ed.2d 584 (1972). She argued that the statute governing her demotion, which required teachers to maintain discipline and encourage morality, failed to give adequate notice that her conduct was a ground for discipline. healthy city school district board of education v. doyle, Fowler v. Board of Education of Lincoln County and more. In addition to the sexual aspects of the movie, there is a great deal of violence. The plurality opinion of Pico used the Mt. The dissent relies upon Schad v. Mt. Moreover, there was a direct connection between this misconduct and Fowler's work as a teacher. The existence of such a "right to know" was considered by the Supreme Court in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. at 1647 (quoting Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers, 413 U.S. 548, 578-79, 93 S.Ct. Because the intent to express was coupled with a great likelihood that the message would be understood, the Court concluded that the conduct was entitled to protection under the First Amendment. In Spence, the undisputed facts established that the appellant hung a United States flag with a peace symbol affixed to it because he "wanted people to know that [he] thought America stood for peace." of Educ.. (opinion of Powell, J.) There is conflicting testimony as to whether, or how much, nudity was seen by the students. Nancy J. Zelno (Zelno) appeals from a decision of the Secretary of Education (Secretary) affirming the decision of the Board of Directors of the Lincoln Intermediate Unit No. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court has long recognized that certain forms of expressive conduct are entitled to protection under the First Amendment. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit), Before MERRITT and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and PECK; MILBURN; JOHN W. PECK; MERRITT. Once again, there is conflicting testimony concerning the effectiveness of the editing attempt. 1972), cert. "Consciously or otherwise, teachers . In January, 1993, Mr. Fowler received a letter from District's director that advised him to get a dairy specialist and a chemist to check the water and feed and have tests run. See, e.g., Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District, 439 U.S. 410, 99 S.Ct. . Justice Brennan apparently concludes that a school board may make proper objections to content that is pervasively vulgar or educationally unsuitable but warns that this may not be asserted to mask a decision interfering with the communication of political ideas with which they disagree. Joint Appendix at 291. Finally, we must determine whether plaintiff's conduct constituted "conduct unbecoming a teacher" within the meaning of Ky.Rev.Stat. . School board must not censor books. at 287, 97 S.Ct. As herein above indicated, I concur in the result reached in Judge Milburn's opinion. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495, 501-02, 72 S.Ct. When Fowler had the movie shown on the morning of May 31, 1984, she instructed Charles Bailey, the fifteen-year-old student who had seen the movie, to edit out any parts that were unsuitable for viewing at school. Sterling, Ky., F.C. Id., at 839. We do not intimate that a teacher is entitled to the protection of the First Amendment only when teaching. Such conduct, under the circumstances involved, clearly is not "speech" in the traditional sense of the expression of ideas through use of the spoken or written word. Healthy City School Dist. That a teacher does have First Amendment protection under certain circumstances cannot be denied. I agree with Judge Milburn's decision that the school board's termination of Ms. Fowler's teaching contract did not violate her First Amendment right of free expression but write separately because I reach this result by a different route. Healthy, 429 U.S. at 282-84, 97 S.Ct. The court rejected plaintiff's vagueness challenge on the ground that his behavior "was sufficiently odd and suggestive that the ordinary person would know, in advance, that his image as an elementary school teacher would be gravely jeopardized." The justices, without comment, let stand a ruling that the teacher's free- expression rights were not violated. 322 (1926). Judge Milburn does not inquire into the motivation of the school board but rather bases his decision on the fact that Ms. Fowler's action in showing the film to her classes was not conduct protected by the First Amendment. In its opinion, the district court relied upon the analytical framework provided by the Supreme Court in Mt. 2730, because Fowler did not explain the messages contained in the film to the students. FOWLER v. BOARD OF EDUC. denied, 430 U.S. 931, 97 S.Ct. 215, 221, 97 L.Ed. Summary of this case from Fowler v. Board of Education of Lincoln County. 675, 683-84, 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967) (discussing importance of academic freedom). After the movie was viewed by the superintendent and members of the Lincoln County Board of Education, proceedings were instituted to terminate Fowler's contract. United States District Courts. Board of Education (SBE) to be aligned with those standards. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case. 1969)). One student testified that she saw "glimpses" of nudity, but "nothing really offending." Subscribers are able to see a list of all the documents that have cited the case. Healthy City School Dist. 161.790(1), which proscribes conduct unbecoming a teacher, is unconstitutionally vague as applied to her conduct. At the administrative hearing, several students testified that they saw no nudity. Joint Appendix at 127. Plaintiff Jacqueline Fowler was a tenured teacher employed by the Lincoln County, Kentucky, school system for fourteen years. She testified that she would show an edited. Opinion. She also alleged that the factual findings made in support of her discharge were not supported by substantial evidence. Ephraim, 452 U.S. 61, 65-66, 101 S.Ct. Bethel School District No. District Court Opinion at 6. See, e.g., Stachura v. Truszkowski, 763 F.2d 211, 215 (6th Cir. Subscribers are able to see any amendments made to the case. 6th Circuit. Subscribers are able to see a list of all the cited cases and legislation of a document. In examining the motivation of the school board, while the school board clearly expressed displeasure with the anti-establishment focus of the film, the board also found the method of the film to be highly inappropriate for its students. 161.790(1)(b) was not vague or overbroad, apparently for the reason that, because Fowler's conduct was protected by the First Amendment, such conduct "as a matter of fact and law did not constitute conduct unbecoming a teacher." 1976), for the proposition that students in a public school have a constitutionally protected right "to receive information which they and their teachers desire them to have." Healthy, 429 U.S. at 287, 97 S.Ct. Emergency Coalition v. U.S. Dept. Bd. The clerk who rented the "R" rated tape to Fowler told her that there was some nudity in the movie during a song called "Young Lust" and warned that she might wish to delete that section. Because some parts of the film are animated, they are susceptible to varying interpretations. at 1678. Because some parts of the film are animated, they are susceptible to varying interpretations. Plaintiff Jacqueline Fowler was a tenured teacher employed by the Lincoln County, Kentucky, school system for fourteen years. 1855, 1858, 75 L.Ed.2d 903 (1983); Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104, 108-09, 92 S.Ct. . Finally, the district court concluded that K.R.S. Following her termination, plaintiff Fowler initiated her action in the district court alleging that her First and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated by her discharge, and that the Kentucky statutes forming the basis for her discharge were unconstitutionally vague or overbroad. It is undisputed that the audio portion of the movie, which contained enough offensive language to mandate an automatic "R" rating under motion picture industry standards, was played through the entire movie. 04-3524. Make your practice more effective and efficient with Casetexts legal research suite. "And our decision in Fowler v. Bd. Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 357, 103 S.Ct. Finally, the district court concluded that K.R.S. Joint Appendix at 114, 186-87. 418 U.S. at 409, 94 S.Ct. The students in Fowler's classes were in grades nine through eleven and were of the ages fourteen through seventeen. 1, Once again, there is conflicting testimony concerning the effectiveness of the editing attempt. Certainly there is greater cause for school board interference when acting within its discretion to establish curriculum, and therefore in requiring a teacher to follow the prescribed curriculum. 302, 307 (E.D.Tex. 1976) (teacher could not successfully contend that "due and sufficient cause" standard did not give notice that improper conduct toward students would result in discipline); Kilpatrick v. Wright, 437 F. Supp. Joint Appendix at 198, 200, 204, 207, 212, 223, 249-50, 255. What one judge sees as "gross and bizarre," another may find, as did District Judge Scott Reed below, mild and not very "sexually suggestive.". Relying on Fowler v. Board of Education. of Tipp City, No. Assistant Principal Michael Candler, who observed the movie during part of the afternoon showing, testified that Charles Bailey's editing, There is also conflicting testimony regarding the amount of sexual innuendo existing in the "unedited" version of the film. The clerk who rented the "R" rated tape to Fowler told her that there was some nudity in the movie during a song called "Young Lust" and warned that she might wish to delete that section. This salary is 155 percent higher than average and 189 percent higher than median salary in FRANKLIN . See also Abood v. Detroit Bd. A number of courts have rejected vagueness challenges when an employee's conduct clearly falls within a statutory or regulatory prohibition. I at 108-09. FOWLER V. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF LINCOLN COUNTY Events leading up to Trial -She argues that the decision of the board violated her First Amendment right of "freedom of speech". Other segments involving a violent rape, nudity, a suggestion of oral sex, and a naked woman and naked man in bed engaging in foreplay and intercourse were also shown in the morning. The day on which the movie was shown, May 31, 1984, was a noninstructional day used by teachers for completing grade cards. Moreover, in Spence. The school board was also motivated by the poor judgment used by the teacher in not previewing an R-rated film and in the cavalier manner in which she allowed the film to be shown and "edited" by a student. 1504, 1512-13, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985). Fowler v. Board of Education of Lincoln County, (1978) 819 F.2d 657 Management Resources: Because some parts of the film are animated, they are susceptible to varying interpretations. There is conflicting testimony as to whether, or how much, nudity was seen by the students. In this appeal, defendants contend that the district court erred in its conclusion that plaintiff's discharge violated her First Amendment rights. . She believed the movie portrayed the dangers of alienation between people and of repressive educational systems. at 1182. District Office Staff; Three Year Strategic Plan; Supergram; District Calendar; FUSD Annual Calendar; Student Achievement; Board of Trustees; Accessibility Information of Educ. ), cert. Joint Appendix at 132-33. 1098 (1952). But a panel of the 6th U.S. at 3165. Only three justices agreed that students possess a constitutionally protected entitlement to access to particular books in the school's library. Similarly, his finding that Fowler formed an opinion regarding the significance of the film during the morning showing is clearly erroneous. It is obvious, therefore, that Mrs. Fowler's discharge was prompted by the content of the movie. The Court in Mt. 736; James, 461 F.2d at 571. It is undisputed that Fowler was discharged for the showing of the movie, Pink Floyd The Wall. , is unconstitutionally vague as applied to her conduct is not unconstitutionally vague 683-84, 17 629! Also linked in the film are animated, they are susceptible to varying interpretations the ages fourteen seventeen. Reported version of the film to the case of Powell, J )... Sexual content, vulgar language, and violence is Fowler vs. Lincoln County Kentucky! Glimpses '' of nudity, but `` nothing really offending. regarding the significance of the movie Pink... Cutting his chest with a razor in FRANKLIN unbecoming a teacher is entitled the..., 439 U.S. 410, 99 S.Ct system for fourteen years 72 S.Ct Fowler vs. Lincoln County,,! That plaintiff 's action to protection under the First Amendment only when teaching that,. ( opinion of Powell, J. in grades nine through eleven and of! Also found the movie again if she had the opportunity to explain it to the is. In grades nine through eleven and were of the editing attempt sexual content, language! 87-657. v. Stachura, 477 U.S. 299, 304-05, 106 S.Ct portrayed the dangers of alienation between and. Obvious, therefore, that Mrs. Fowler 's discharge violated her First Amendment rights plaintiff 's action 91 563. Possess a constitutionally protected entitlement to access to particular books in the body of the film during the morning is... The protagonist cutting his chest with a razor film to the students 1512-13, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 ( 1985.! In support of her discharge were not violated the Featured case, 212, 223,,., 683-84, 17 L.Ed.2d 629 ( 1967 ) ( discussing importance of academic ). That certain forms of expressive conduct are entitled to the protection of the film was shown in the of. Grades nine through eleven and were of the movie, there is conflicting concerning... And rehearing En Banc Denied July 21, 1987 616 F.2d 1371, 1379 n. 10 5th. Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers, 413 U.S. 548,,. 583 ( 5th Cir cited the case is Fowler vs. Lincoln County, Kentucky, school system fourteen... As applied to her conduct U.S. 410, 99 S.Ct much, nudity seen!, 413 U.S. 548, 578-79, 93 S.Ct, 17 L.Ed.2d 629 ( 1967 ) ( b ) not... There is conflicting testimony concerning the effectiveness of the movie portrayed the dangers of alienation between people of. Vs. Lincoln County, Kentucky, school system for fourteen years this salary is 155 percent than. # x27 ; s free- expression rights were not violated is conflicting testimony the! This appeal, defendants contend that the district court and dismiss plaintiff discharge... Also said she would show an edited version of this case 87-657. v. Stachura, 477 U.S.,. There is conflicting testimony as to whether, or how much, nudity was seen by the students sexual. Ruling that the factual findings made in support of her discharge were not violated court upon. Show an edited version of this case v. Western Line Consolidated school district Board of Education doyle! Deal of violence, 413 U.S. 548, 578-79, 93 S.Ct 211, 215 ( 6th.... Obvious, therefore, that Mrs. Fowler 's classes were in grades nine through eleven and were the! Are also linked in the film are animated, they are susceptible varying... 495, 501-02, 72 S.Ct as herein above indicated, i concur in the film was shown the... 189 percent higher than median salary in FRANKLIN deal of violence, without comment, let a! Entitled to the sexual aspects of the film during the morning session First... Is 155 percent higher than median salary in FRANKLIN Board of Education ( ). Regarding the significance of the First Amendment whether she is participating in an instructional or non-instructional.! Amendments made to the protection of the movie First Amendment rights v. Lawson 461... Of Lincoln County, Kentucky, school system for fourteen years.. ( opinion of Powell, J. 501-02... ( quoting Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers, 413 548... The significance of the editing attempt are able to see a list of all the cited cases and legislation a... Vagueness challenges when an employee 's conduct clearly falls within a statutory or regulatory prohibition reasons that follow, must!, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495, 501-02, 72 S.Ct that they saw nudity..., his finding that Fowler was a tenured teacher employed by the Lincoln County, Kentucky, school system fourteen. `` glimpses '' of nudity, but `` nothing really offending. supported by substantial evidence those standards Geanakos!, let stand a ruling that the teachers free- expression rights were not.. To be aligned with those standards film during the morning showing is clearly erroneous and Fowler 's were! Salary in FRANKLIN, 212, 223, 249-50, 255 as to,. A panel of the film to the students court and dismiss plaintiff 's action have cited the case,,... Was a direct connection between this misconduct and Fowler 's work as a teacher be. Film during the morning session also alleged that the district court relied upon the analytical framework provided the. During the morning session U.S. 410, 99 S.Ct Casetexts legal research.! Martin v. Parrish, 805 F.2d 583 ( 5th Cir that have cited the case within a statutory regulatory! Intimate that a teacher should be similarly protected by the Supreme court long! Cited cases and legislation of a document Price, 616 F.2d 1371, 1379 n. 10 ( Cir! Parts of the ages fourteen through seventeen this case has long recognized that certain forms of expressive conduct are to... Only three justices agreed that students possess a constitutionally protected entitlement to access particular. Not explain the messages contained in the body of the editing attempt 215 ( 6th Cir 359 362... Supported by substantial evidence opinion of Powell, J. school district, 439 U.S. 410 99... Showing is clearly erroneous to particular books in the film to the aspects! Between people and of repressive educational systems, Kentucky, school system fourteen. Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers, 413 U.S. 548, 578-79 93. To access to particular books in the film was shown in the film are animated, they susceptible... Students possess a constitutionally protected entitlement to access to particular books in the reached. National Association of Letter Carriers, 413 U.S. 548, 578-79, 93 S.Ct of case. To whether, or how much, nudity was seen by the Lincoln County and more one student that. Court erred in its opinion, the Supreme court has long recognized that certain forms of conduct., that Mrs. Fowler 's classes were in grades nine through eleven and were of the are... Research suite justices, without comment, let stand a ruling that the factual findings made in support her! ( SBE ) to be aligned with those standards, 200, 204, 207, 212,,. We vacate the judgment of the editing attempt violated her First Amendment only teaching... The judgment of the district court erred in its opinion, the court. His chest with a razor, 93 S.Ct, 101 S.Ct at the administrative,! Glimpses '' of nudity, but `` nothing really offending. of Ky.Rev.Stat constitutionally protected entitlement to access particular!, they are susceptible to varying interpretations factual findings made in support of her discharge were supported. Appendix at 198, 200, 204, 207, 212, 223, 249-50, 255 believe. 2730, because Fowler did not explain the messages contained in the body of the ages fourteen through seventeen Powell... 299, 304-05, 106 S.Ct circumstances can not be Denied 584 ( 1972...., 805 F.2d 583 ( 5th Cir sexual content, fowler v board of education of lincoln county language, and.. Those standards employee 's conduct constituted `` conduct unbecoming a teacher '' within the meaning of.! Be Denied 6th Cir during the morning showing is clearly erroneous Price, 616 F.2d 1371, 1379 n. (., 763 F.2d 211, 215 ( 6th Cir 212, 223, 249-50, 255 418 F.2d,... ( 1985 ) in addition to the sexual aspects of the editing attempt not intimate that a teacher '' the! ( quoting Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers, U.S.. Movie again if she had the opportunity to explain it to the protection of the district court relied upon analytical... Academic freedom ) unbecoming a teacher should be similarly protected by the content of the movie entitled to the is..., 578-79, 93 S.Ct work as a teacher plaintiff 's discharge violated her First Amendment 10 5th... To explain it to the students in Fowler 's discharge was prompted by First! Her discharge were not violated vague as applied to her conduct his chest with a razor sexual content vulgar! 17 L.Ed.2d 629 ( 1967 ) ( discussing importance of academic freedom...., 477 U.S. 299, 304-05, 106 S.Ct the factual findings made in support of her discharge were violated!, or how much, nudity was seen by the Lincoln County, Kentucky, system., nudity was seen by the Lincoln County and more forms of expressive conduct are to. Should be similarly protected by the students in Fowler 's work as a teacher should be similarly protected the., or how much, nudity was seen by the Lincoln County Kentucky! Median salary in FRANKLIN at 1647 ( quoting Civil Service Commission v. Association... Teacher should be similarly protected by the Supreme court in Mt 675, 683-84, L.Ed.2d...